.

Letter to the Editor: It's Your Waterfront, Alexandria!

Andrew Macdonald of Citizens for an Alternative Alexandria Waterfront Plan says there is no real waterfront plan, just vague guidelines put together through a cloudy process.

It's your waterfront, Alexandria!

It is until Jan. 21, anyway. That’s when the majority Democratic City Council will hold a final public hearing on the waterfront plan. Democrats on council appear to have already decided to give 8.5 acres of prime historic river shoreline away to developers for what amounts to little more then the gilded and glitzy promise of tax revenue and a “waterfront for all.”

At the work session last week, the mayor announced, “We can’t please everyone,” as if the differences of opinion between citizens and elected officials and planners can never be resolved, and the debate has been going on as long as that over whether to build a museum at Fort Belvoir [laughter].

Then, there was this recent response to a constituent from another member of Council who I will not name: “Opponents of the city’s efforts have been clear they will work to stop anything. If you see some outcome for these three sites that would be different with more time, I'd love to hear it. I think the bigger question is do we let a group of people mislead, grandstand, threaten, and misrepresent facts over and over. At some point the city has to move forward.”

This is what I would politely call a yarn, spun to preserve the real status quo here and obscure the truths we all agree on. We do have warehouses that block us all from enjoying a great natural resource, stop us from retelling our nation’s history, don’t help Old Town thrive, and don’t improve property values.

Here are a few observations worth retelling. The City began with one central theme in mind: “boutique-ish” hotels, higher density, and more flexibility for developers. Citizens objected and the response was you are too late, your alternatives are unrealistic, and our plan costs taxpayers nothing. Nothing? A vision?

There is no waterfront plan, really. The developers and property owners might as well have written the vague guidelines that exist in its place. History and the arts were inserted at the 11th hour and take a back seat to the rezoning goals. You don’t need to be a conspiracy theorist to see that the city had made up its mind about the purpose of this planning process long before it ever held is first public meeting in 2009.

Sound familiar?

Then there is the small point that the “plan” being voted on next Saturday does not capture the vision of a large slice of the community. Additionally, issues like traffic, the environment, parking, public access, parks, and great public places won’t be addressed until later, if ever. Don’t BRAC the waterfront? No cost-benefit analysis? I can just hear the laughter.

In this case, and I’m afraid in several other instances across Alexandria, the line between what should be fair, transparent, and thoughtful public policy debate has been replaced with laughter, claims that opponents are misrepresenting the facts and seeking to delay the plan’s approval for political reasons.

Spot planning in a National Historic Landmark district, short-term thinking,  cozy relationships with developers…….Ha-ha-ha.

Well, it’s your waterfront, Alexandria, at least until Saturday.

Andrew Macdonald, co-founder of Citizens for an Alternative Alexandria Waterfront Plan

 

 

District Watch January 20, 2012 at 12:32 AM
This is all about lining campaign accounts of current city council members, that's it....they are owned by the developers.
Bob Marley December 22, 2012 at 01:37 PM
The 150+ acres of parks along the waterfront you are speaking about includes areas owned by the national park service. The city of Alexandria owns about 30 acres of park land along the waterfront. This means that about 4% of Alexandria's parks are on the waterfront.
lynnhampton December 22, 2012 at 02:10 PM
Mark - three, going on four years is not a rush. The majority of the citizens of our City have spoken through an election in November. We trust our elected officials in a system of representative democracy, to know more than we do. This is a wise decision to move forward and make Union Street and the Waterfront more accessible.
Jim Roberts December 23, 2012 at 12:53 AM
Wrong: "We trust our elected officials in a system of representative democracy to know more than we do." Right: Informed citizens are essential for a democracy to succeed. The individuals whom they elect are their public servants. When public servants husband information, they improperly take to themselves power not conferred by those whom they took an oath to serve. Secret information kept by public servants is secret power, the antithesis of democracy.
Mark Mueller December 23, 2012 at 02:27 AM
I find it very strange that Ms. Hampton responded to my post 11 months after I posted. That could be a Patch.com record. Where have you been the last 11 months.. How is the MWAA audit and Congressional investigation coming along for you ma'am? Weren't you the CFO at MWAA? Have a Merry Christmas everyone!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something