patching...
Breaking: Alexandria Police ID Victim in Lynhaven Shooting »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Andrew Macdonald Announces Mayoral Candidacy

Former Alexandria vice mayor announces he will run as an independent candidate against Mayor Bill Euille in November's election.

 

Andrew Macdonald, a former Alexandria vice mayor, announced Friday that he will challenge Mayor Bill Euille in November’s election as an independent candidate.

Macdonald announced his decision on WAMU’s Kojo Nnamdi Show.

“Yes, I am going to challenge Mayor Bill Euille in the upcoming November race,” Macdonald said. “I think we need to find a way to bring Alexandrians together. It’s been a very divisive atmosphere in Alexandria. I just don’t see working in the party as the way to do it at the moment.”

Macdonald was elected to City Council in 2003 and 2006 as a Democrat, taking the most votes among candidates in the 2006 race and earning the title of vice mayor. He resigned 18 months into his second term for personal reasons.

In the last year, Macdonald has emerged as one of the leading voices in opposition to waterfront redevelopment in the city. He is a cofounder of Citizens for an Alternative Alexandria Waterfront Plan.

City Council approved a waterfront redevelopment plan in February, but not a rezoning amendment because it remains tied up in legal issues.

Alexandria Democratic Committee Chairman Dak Hardwick confirmed Friday on The Kojo Nnamdi Show that Macdonald had officially resigned from the ADC. Macdonald renewed his membership with the party in December and was part of a recent email chain among ADC members considering running for office, Hardwick said.

“There’s just a general feeling in Alexandria, and I certainly feel that way, that the current Democratic majority on council effectively dismissed a great deal of public input and involvement in a number of very important issues,” Macdonald said. “So for me [my resignation from the ADC], was really a symbolic gesture as much as anything.”

Later in the interview, Macdonald said he has “always had a pretty difficult time within the confines of the Democratic party” in part because of the way party members “have tried to shut down public conversation” in the city. He also said he felt the political structure in Alexandria “really needs a shake-up.”

On March 1, Macdonald announced to the Alexandria Republican City Committee that he was seriously considering running against Euille as an independent and asked for the committee’s support.

On Friday, a listener asked Macdonald why he left office in 2008 and if he’d do it again.

“It was a very different time and I certainly will not leave if elected,” Macdonald replied.

Related Topics: Andrew MacDonald, Bill Euille, Citizens for an Alternative Alexandria Waterfront Plan, and Kojo Nnamdi

Karen Gautney

9:05 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012

I can't help but think of the parallel with Sarah Palin. Both she and Macdonald quit the job they were elected to do, spent years criticizing elected representatives who were actually on the job, while asserting they could do it better. Folks like Palin and Macdonald thrive as outsiders, instigators with no responsibility or accountability, just the assertion that they are superior. I, for one, will cast my vote for Mayor Euille. You might say is a vote for Mr. Macdonald to remain in his role as Alexandria's chief complainer and criticizer, the job he's best suited for.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Leigh Talbot

7:31 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

This sort of nonsensical analogy and subsequent vitriol are really unbecoming of Alexandrians who claim to care about our City. Choice is a good thing when it comes to electing our local leaders. We all should embrace it.

Comment_arrow

Gina Baum

10:07 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Please Leigh.....the person most respoonsible for the division and vitriol in this community is his majesty himself....Andrew Macdonald. The one who abandoned his post, at a cost of $100 grand to tax payers for a special election. He shouldn't be allowed to run for anything without paying back the money spent on the special election to fill his seat after his abrupt resignation.

Comment_arrow

Haunches

9:17 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

If it really cost $100 grand for a special election, our financial mismanagement problems are a lot bigger than just ACPS.

Jim Roberts

10:48 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012

My my, the vitriol from the Democratic Party apparatchik makes clear the well spring of divisiveness in Alexandria. Instead of being delighted that voters have a choice, McDonald or Euille, they reveal their true colors: My Way Or The Highway.

Where is this unbridled nastiness coming from? What I thought was a national debasement of civil discourse has now polluted our local elections.

Frankly, I am delighted voters have a choice. I am looking forward to permitting the incumbent to defend his path and the challenger to explain the one he believes the better direction.

Reply

Mark Mueller

10:23 am on Saturday, March 10, 2012

This is great news and I wholeheartedly agree with Andrew's assessment of the state of affairs in City government and the current regime on Council. My hope is that residents will cast aside national party affiliations and take back control of our beloved City. I have worked very closely with Andrew on the Waterfront and it has been a great experience. He has brought together people of all political affiliations to work together for a better waterfront plan and more inclusive process. I am very confident that his/our efforts with regard to defeating the current plan and coming up with a bettter plan will be a success. The current plan is going no where folks. I trust Andrew and applaud his annoucement. Ignore the mudslingers and make up your own mind. Lets move forward Alexandria.

Reply

Dennis Auld

12:53 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Mr. McDonald, running for election will require you to tell the citizens your solutions to problems, rather than just criticizing what the current administration is doing. Your initial position on the CAAWP plan was for the city to buy those properties and turn them into a park. This would truly achieve an Alexandria for only the 1 percent because the debt load of the city would increase nearly 50%.. Do you have similar positions on the issues of affordable housing? How do you handle the rights of property owners? Scattered site housing has been well tested to reduce the need for pubic housing in second and third generations. Density in an urban area is smart growth. Start to enlighten the voter now as to your solutions. Put up a wall around Alexandria and say “No More”? Will your platform be “No Developers Allowed”. For years the City has struggled with a greater than 50% contribution of property taxes being shouldered by residences. Are you opposed to efforts to rectify that by expanding the commercial base? If not the results are truly a 1 percent city with a heavy residential tax burden. Providing good public housing and affordable housing is important to all citizens. Enlighten us Mr. McDonald, what are your solutions? We have problems and our City Council addresses these on a regular basis.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Roberts

7:38 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

(Mr. Auld makes merry-go-round comments. He's posted these very remarks at least once before elsewhere. They make him, and his fellow travelers, sound angry that McDonald is challenging our current mayor.

The combined effect of their collective disgruntlement makes me wonder if they regard our mayor more as their Dear Leader rather than a elected citizen taking the city in directions that, I suspect, most don't want to go.

Mr. Auld, et al, should be pleased citizens have a choice for our next mayor. It's the American way, after all

More: It would also be enlightenening if he would explain when density becomes not smart growth. If a school or a movie theater can hold only so many people, then if follows the same is true for a small city. Is it three hundred thousand residents? One million residents? One trillion? Surely there is a limit to how dense Alexandria should if not could become?).

lawgal

2:26 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

It's certainly important for Alexandria citizens to discuss the issues and candidates. I do not want to hear allegations that any party or cabal is attempting to suppress or intimidate public debate. Competition is fine in these races, although I tend to agree with Karen's points above.

It may be possible for difficult and divisive issues to be submitted for referendum vote (although I will defer to those who are experts at Virginia local government law - and they do exist in the Commonwealth). Some zoning questions are now before the courts, and nothing will happen until decisions are rendered. It's naive for MacDonald to think he can unite the city on any issue.

Reply

Hugh M. Van Horn

2:42 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

My wife and I are truly delighted that Andrew McDonald has tossed his hat in the ring for mayor of Alexandria. He will bring a fresh and much-needed perspective. Enough of the vitriol and enough of the horribly poor decision-making -- like BRAC-133, Arlnadria, the Beuregard Corridor, and PotomacYard, much less the City's excuse for a waterfront plan!

Reply

Russ Adams

6:45 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Actually, I think it's time to do away with "at large" council elections. It under represents minorities. This is a city of neighborhoods with diferent problems & concerns. It's time for council to be elected based on precincts & neighborhoods.

Reply

Mark Mueller

6:54 pm on Saturday, March 10, 2012

Russ- I totally agree, but I believe that such a change would require Council and the Mayor to ask Richmond for permission to change the City's charter. Having a Ward system would ensure better local neighborhood representation - no doubt, and reduce the ability for one party - hijacked or not, Republican or Democrat - to steamroll the citizens as I believe is the case presently. Perhaps the citizens of all political persuasions should ask all candidates to commit to pushing for that before voting for them?? Sign a pledge "I will push for a Ward system"

Reply

Edgar Warfield

4:32 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

This 'ol Democrat wonders if Andrew MacDonald is still willing to raise taxes to pay for his waterfront dreams and/or schemes. Now that he's running for mayor, I suspect he'll change his tune rather quickly -- but he said publicly he'd be in favor of higher taxes for the waterfront:

http://oldtownalexandria.patch.com/articles/waterfront-work-group-mission-statement-concerns-alexandria-chamber-of-commerce

Reply

Dennis Auld

8:37 am on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Mr. Roberts, in response to your analysis of my comments, yes, that particular comment has been placed before. It is intended to ask Mr. Macdonald to indicate what he would bring to the table in regards to solutions for the City's issues/problems. We would like to hear that from any candidate. I do not understand how asking for that makes me sound "sound angry that McDonald is challenging our current mayor." Quite the contrary, I welcome a variety of candidates. I would like to know what their position is on various issues. Whether you agree or not with how Mr. Euille has led the city, his record is there to look at, and question. I would like to see Mr. Macdonald (now that he has announced officially that he is running for Mayor) to enlighten us on these issues. Like Ms. Talbot, I am an Independent who will study, and vote for the candidates who I feel will bring the best efforts to managing our City. Having spent several years on BFAAC, I know how difficult this task is, and do not take it lightly.

As to your remark on smart growth, it appears that you would like to build a wall around Alexandria and say "this is enough." If so (and please enlighten me if I misread your comment) then I suggest you avail yourself to studies on smart growth, which are numerous. I suggest http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/pdf/density.pdf as a strating point as it incorporates density which seems to be a hot topic around here. But plenty others.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Roberts

10:42 am on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

I appreciate you only want what's best for our city. We are allies.

However, clamoring repeatedly for instant answers to fine questions does not reflect the pleasure you profess for the choice McDonald represents to voters.

Nor does refusing to declare when further growth becomes not smart. Since there is a point of diminishing returns for all defined spaces, you must have in mind a desired density for Alexandria?

If you have yet to wrap your head around this conundrum, then start with something basic. For example, how many vehicles can our city streets accommodate from the morning rush hour through the evening rush hour, and how many should they accommodate?

The first question is far easier to answer than the second as the Duke Street rapid bus transit work group is discovering.

Dennis Auld

11:41 am on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Hardly clamoring for instant answers. Just letting Mr. Macdonald know what I will be asking in the future, and he can decide on the appropriate time to address them. You may notice that Boyd Walker is posting quite frequently in various media his position on topics. Whil I don't agree with Mr. Walker on some issues, I appreciate that he is getting out there and making position statement. Would like to see the same from Andrew.

As to density, no I do not have a definitive concept of "diminishing returns. I think it is foolhardy to try and control that, and would not work. You need to deal with the issues as they arise, and plan for proper support systems. While on BFAAC, we spent time on forecasting capabilities at the City. We also soent time comparing the management of Alexandria to other cities of comparable size and issues, and found Alexandria rated very well in its administration. I get the sense that you feel you know the answer to your questions about diminishing returns. Is that true? If yes, do you have numbers? My education tells me that controlled economies never function like the proponents wished. Maybe you have better solutions.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Roberts

12:26 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Let's leave it at (a) you have put challenger McDonald on notice that he better start explaining and (b) you subscribe to unlimited, unrestrained density because it's foolhardy to control growth. More and more and even more is good, best and better

Personally, I think Alexandria is already right-sized, an admittedly subjective judgment that's reinforced daily when I creep-drive in rush hour traffic, especially on Duke Street.

Dennis Auld

4:52 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

OK with A, but remember I said when he feels appropriate. As for "B", no way. Seems like you are "all or nothing". I am for smart growth, which is neither unlimited, or put up the wall.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark Mueller

9:43 am on Friday, March 16, 2012

Mr. Auld - what is your definition of Smart Growth?

William Black

9:17 pm on Friday, March 16, 2012

As one of those racists who sends his kids to private school, I would vote for a bar of soap before I'd cast a ballot for Bill Euille.

Reply

Dennis Auld

10:13 am on Saturday, March 17, 2012

Mr. Mueller, it would be specific to Alexandria, but the link is to a pretty good document that, I think, will answer your question.

http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/pdf/density.pdf

Reply

Gina Baum

3:50 am on Thursday, March 22, 2012

Great - the guy whose been dividing Alexandrians for months now -- encouraging citizens to sue the City --- somehow thinks he has the ability to unite Alex? Abruptly leaves office at cost of 100 grand to tax payers for a special election....here's a clue, we all have difficulties in life, unfortunately for the majority of us working stiffs, we don't have the luxury of quitting our jobs during life's challenges...We do both. The fact that this guy abonfoned his elected duties after taking the oath of office is indicative of poor judgement. Its hotter in Mayor's kitchen... If he couldn't handle the heat on Council, clearly he's not qualified to take it a step further.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Silence Dogood

8:51 am on Friday, May 4, 2012

Somehow, if Macdonald becomes Mayor I don't see him having a street named after himself like Euille...of course, Macdonald doesn't seem like the type of man to be in the pocket of the developers either.

Leave a comment