patching...
Breaking: VA GOP Nominates Ken Cuccinelli for Governor's Race »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Letter to the Editor: Mayor Euille Is a True Consensus Builder with the Right Skills for the Job

The Rigbys of N. Pitt Street laud Mayor Euille for his leadership and experience and say his mayoral rival this election, Andrew Macdonald, is the wrong choice for Alexandria.

 

Dear Editor,

Historically Alexandria has always been a City at Crossroads. However, rather than talk about polar bears, icebergs and trips to exotic places, as independent mayoral candidate Andrew Macdonald likes to do, we'd rather talk about how Alexandria has actually been guided through its crossroads by our current Democratic mayor, Bill Euille, and why Mayor Euille has the experience, vision and commitment to continue leading Alexandria forward.

Mayor Euille has dedicated his life to Alexandria.

He attended and excelled in both segregated and desegregated public schools and received an academic scholarship from Quinnipiac University in Connecticut.

Upon earning his accounting degree, Mayor Euille returned to Alexandria, joined a local construction company, learned the business from the ground up and rose to be vice president and comptroller. In 1987, he founded his own company, an Alexandria-based construction services firm and, in 1994, established a foundation where he and his firm contribute continuously to local causes.

We have know Bill Euille's background and accomplishments since 1966. We moved into Old Town in 1974 and when Bill entered Alexandria politics, we became strong supporters through his 10 years on the School Board, nine years on City Council and nine years as Alexandria's first African-American mayor. 

Contrast that with Mr. Macdonald's background, which saw his first election to City Council in 2003 and then his election as Vice Mayor in 2006, only to see him step away from his commitment to Alexandria and abruptly resign from that post midway through his term.

Only recently has Mr. Macdonald reappeared on the Alexandria political scene.   As we observe the recent discussions on issues like the waterfront and the Beauregard Small Area Plan, the "elephant in the room" is Mr. Macdonald's desire to be mayor.

It was always thinly veiled at best, but Mr. Macdonald needed a new "platform" from which to base a campaign. In order to "reintroduce" himself to the Alexandria community through the waterfront debate, Mr. Macdonald engaged in mudslinging in order to discredit the extensive work of the Planning Commission, Waterfront Work Group, Mayor Euille and the entire Alexandria City Council. This is Andrew Macdonald's version of "consensus."

Mr. Macdonald is fond of saying that the City isn't listening to the citizens, and he makes this charge on a regular basis. But Mr. Macdonald is wrong. It is our experience that our elected City leadership will listen to all its citizens. But, when some of its citizens erroneously and unfairly accuse City officials, especially Mayor Euille, of outright corruption without any substantiated facts or evidence, a line has been crossed.

It is our view that Mr. Macdonald has crossed that line too many times to claim he is a "consensus" builder. Mr. Macdonald has displayed a divisive form of leadership and does not deserve the honor and privilege of serving as Alexandria's Mayor.

Alexandria's history is that of a divided city - rich and poor, black and white, east and west.  As the only true consensus builder running for Mayor, Bill Euille has worked his entire life to create "One Alexandria."

Mayor Euille has seen the divisions in our City. He grew up with those divisions and always had an eye to bringing all sides together. Mayor Euille knows Alexandria. He governs with intelligence, dignity, grace, patience, poise and often with a sense of humor. He listens, and he gets it! Bill Euille has a proven track record of leadership and experience to keep moving Alexandria forward.  He knows of our City's past and its potential for the future.

For the first time ever, Alexandria's first African-American mayor and our country's first African-American president will be on the ballot together.  What a truly historic time for our City and our Nation - and both Bill Euille and Barack Obama have earned our support in this critical election year.

Hazel and Ron Rigby, North Pitt Street

Related Topics: Bill Euille

Bea Porter

9:21 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012

As Mr. Obama's campaign said, "change" its time for change. Mayor Euille has been in office long enough, now its time for change. Mr. MacDonald stepped down from office for personal reasons, reasons most of us can relate to. It is time for him to come back and bring Alexandria together. Mr. MacDonald also has a long history in the City.

Reply

Publius Publicola

9:30 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012

Mayor Euille lied about the facts in the Trayvon Martin case at the rally in Market Square. What else has Mayor Euille lied about to the residents of Alexandria?

Reply

Jon Rosenbaum

10:01 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012

Just how can we "relate" to Mr. Mac Donald's "personal problems" since we do not know what they were. Most of us have personal problems but don't quit our jobs. He needs to be transparent and tell us exactly why he resigned so we voters can determine whether there is a high probability of a repeat resignation.

Reply

Gail G

10:52 am on Thursday, May 17, 2012

Also...I don't think someone's marital problems or having an affair necessarily means that someone is unfit to govern, but resigning office over it is another matter. Someone in that position should, in my opinion, suck it up, finish their tem and take their lumps and not cost the city $60,000 in special election costs. Another story I heard was that Macdonald resigned because he couldn't get anything done and didn't get along with the other members of council. Frankly, in my opinion, that is a worse reason for resgination than personal or marital problems. I won't vote for a cry baby who can't hack the pressure of elected office.

Reply

donotpaveparadise

1:42 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012

None of this private dross seems all that germaine. I don't find myself interested in Bill Euille's private life, or those of most politicians. I for one felt rather sad for David Englin because I frankly do not think that what happens in his private life is important to his ability to make decisions in office. However, the public seems to put pressure on politicians to resign whenever they smell something amiss--I wonder if that is why David Englin resigned?

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Sharon McLoone

1:49 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012

A comment has been removed for violating Patch terms of use.

Reply

amy lu

2:11 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012

Up to now Rep. Englin has not resigned from office.
He did announce he would run for his seat again.
http://delray.patch.com/articles/del-englin
Hopefully he was in Richmond for this last round of voting. Anyone know?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Publius Publicola

3:13 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012

No. He has been AWOL recently on votes including a big vote on the budget. Has he given up??

Gail G

4:13 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012

David Englin has said he will NOT seek re-election. It is expected that he will resign, but no one knows for sure when that will be. He could choose to serve out his term, but the most effective choice would be to resign in time to allow other declarants for the seat to be on the November ballot so that we don't incur the cost of a special election. I've heard rumors that Englin will do just that, but I have not heard it directly from him so I can't confirm.

Reply

Anne Peterson

9:51 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012

The point is not whether he has resigned. The point is, it is tiresome to speculate about the personal lives of politicians in print.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jon Rosenbaum

7:54 pm on Sunday, May 20, 2012

You say it is tiresome to discuss why he resigned. I can understand you viewpoint since you are part of his campaign. But , for example,, if he had health problems, mental or physical, he should admit it. Health problems are not something to be ashamed about - but we need to know that they have been treated and will not interfere with his ability to carry out his duties as mayor.

Gail G

7:30 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

I generally agree with you Anne. The personal lives of politicians only become relevant when it directly impacts their service in the office to which they were elected.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Drew Hansen

2:34 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

A comment was deleted for violating our terms of use.

Reply

Leave a comment