patching...
Update: Do you get the daily Del Ray Patch newsletter? Learn more here! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

ACPS Board Presses Superintendent for Answers on New Foundation

Board members for Alexandria City Public Schools question whether the ACPS Educational Foundation has been set up in an appropriate manner.

 

Alexandria’s School Board pressed the superintendent of ACPS for answers on the creation and operation of a grants foundation, asking whether its current ties to the public school system were appropriate and transparent.

Morton Sherman, superintendent of Alexandria City Public Schools, told board members at a public meeting last week that the new foundation’s aim was to “support the dreams of teachers – be able to give them voice, give them reality.”

He referred to the Dream Fund set up several years ago, which has been overloaded with requests from teachers wishing to embark on special projects.

This year, the Dream Fund to fulfill teachers’ wishes has about $57,000 in the budget “but we had 74 requests…totaling $234,000,” he said. Twenty-four of those 74 teachers had their projects approved last week.

He said the new foundation sought to open new avenues of funds for ACPS.

The new nonprofit Alexandria City Public Schools Education Foundation, a 501(c3), lists former School Board Chairman Sheryl Gorsuch, Deputy Superintendent Madye Henson and Sherman as directors.

Although Sherman said he would prefer to defer questions about the new body to a foundation spokesperson, board Chairman Karen Graf said because he is listed as a director, he should be qualified to answer questions from the board.

Several board members questioned why, if this foundation did not require board approval for its creation, does it use the ACPS name and keep an ACPS mailing address and contact phone number.

“If you’re going to use the ACPS name, you better have permission,” Pat Hennig said, adding that she wanted the superintendent to provide the value of public funds used for printing a four-color brochure promoting the foundation. She questioned whether ACPS staff aided in the creation of the brochure.

Graf asked if there were public funds and human resources being used to support the foundation, to which Sherman replied he’d like to put together a report with answers to the board’s questions for its Jan. 24 meeting.

Vice Chairman Justin Keating asked Sherman how he envisions the relationship of the foundation and the school district and whether it would be similar to the Scholarship Fund of Alexandria. The SFA offers scholarships to college-bound T.C. Williams seniors. ACPS provides some staff support for that program.

Sherman said he would like to create a Memorandum of Understanding and encourage the SFA, ACPS and the foundation’s board of directors to work together to create documents and see a “clear relationship.” He said the new foundation was not designed to compete with the well-established SFA.

He added that the SFA does a “remarkable” job reaching out to individuals but the foundation would look at ripe opportunities for grants. Sherman added that the new foundation's board would be ready to do outreach to the community and elsewhere within about six to nine months.

Christopher Lewis said he had reviewed the foundation’s bylaws and expressed concern that ACPS staff could be “forced” to work for the foundation, to which Sherman replied there would be no “overlapping of staff time.”

But, Sherman added, a foundation committee is reviewing the bylaws.

Audience member Sean McInerney went to the podium and said he is working with former School Board member Eileen Rivera on revising the bylaws.

“The board doesn’t necessarily have a philosophical issue with the idea of an educational foundation,” said Chairman Graf. However, she said concerns linger whether it could negatively impact the SFA. Additionally, she said questions remain over the formation of the foundation and the related tax and legal implications for ACPS.

The board requested tax documentation related to the ACPS Educational Foundation's organization and tax status.

Related Topics: ACPS, Alexandria City Public Schools, Morton Sherman, acps educational foundation, and acps school board

Larry Altenburg

7:49 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Cheers to the new School Board for acting like a board of directors out of the gate. Thank you for questioning the practices of the Superintendant and demanding answers to seemingly inappropriate activity. Keep up the good work.

Please take on other practical matters like setting a school calendar 2 or 3 years in advance like other districts do; the current schedule setting in February or March for an August or September start is not good practice.

Reply

Gail G

8:12 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Anothder Sherman scam. Kudos to the new school board for calling him out.

Reply

Donna Schmidt

10:09 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Finally, a School Board that expects answers from Supt. Sherman himself. The questions asked were very good ones and deserve answers. I look forward to hearing what the answers are.

Reply

suzanne

10:36 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

I like the idea of a foundation, should it have a clear pupose. I would like to see summer enrichment brought back to the district, and a foundation could be a good way to fund it. I would envision it funding teachers projects, similar to the old "super summer". This would keep our kids learning and active over the summer months, as well as support our wonderful and creative teachers.

What I cannot support and don't understand is the lack of transparency from the outset of this foundation. Why? It only discourages trust in our leaders. I do support the new school board in what appears to be something of a "cleanup" effort. Let us hope there are no more skeletons in the closet, and the board can get back to the business of achieving our district's educational goals.

Reply

Heather

4:00 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Kudos to the school board for asking tough questions!

Reply

Kim Moore

9:53 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Wow. A new foundation that lacks transparency AND two new administrative positions for ACPS. Meanwhile, some TC teachers have been advised that funding may cut their positions for next year.

Reply

Edmund Lewis

10:52 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Nowhere in the bylaws of this foundation or in the four-color pamphlet put out by the foundation is the Dream Fund mentioned. Not a single reference. Yet the Dream Fund is apparently now one of the reasons for the creation of this vague foundation. The Dream Fund is a program created by the Superintendent which was started and funded under the previous school board. In 2011, the year in which the foundation in question was incorporated, 20 out of the 27 Dream Fund applicants received funding for their projects. The following year the number of applicants receiving Dream Fund monies increased to 39 teachers. The wants of more teachers were met through the program. Hardly a sign of any overload for the program. Over three school years the Dream Fund budget increased from $27,000 in 2010 to $57,000 in 2012. Hardly a sign of any lack of funding for the program. The 2012-2013 Dream Fund kicked off November 16 and closed to applicants December 14. A week before the December 14 deadline ACPS administrators were sending memos labeled "Urgent" seeking Dream Fund applications. These memos went out immediately after Alexandrianews.org broke a story calling into question the creation of the foundation. The availability of existing funding, history of participation, and the timing and urgency of the call for applications begs the question: has the foundation been created to meet the demands of the teachers or has demand been created to justify the existence of the foundation?

Reply

Gail G

11:00 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Sherman may be a self promoting fraud, but I never took him for being stupid. Given all the negative attention he and the past board were already receiving, the sloppiness surrounding the creation of this "foundation" is really very surprising. Gorsuch isn't stupid either, so why were they so stupid about this? I am genuinely confused. What is their goal?

Reply

Bill Purdy

7:07 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013

If the projects to be funded by such a foundation are well-conceived and contribute to the educational mission of ACPS, why aren't they being included in the annual ACPS budget?

Reply

Leave a comment